RTG Group — AI Visibility Dashboard

All brands — visibility ranking

Visibility % = visibility_count ÷ visibility_total from Peec.ai brand report API · click any row to open brand detail · blue = own brand · red = competitor · Δ = 28d vs prior 28d (API-computed)

#	Brand	Role	Visibility	Bar	Avg position	Sentiment	Δ 28d (API)

Visibility % — weekly trend (13 weeks, Feb 24 – May 24) · API: date dimension, aggregated weekly

Sentiment score — own brands · API: sentiment_sum ÷ sentiment_count · target ≥ 60

Weekly visibility — selected brand vs own-group average · API: date dimension

RAG status — based on API metrics

Visibility by AI model channel

API: model_channel_id dimension · visibility_count ÷ visibility_total per channel · 28d window

Prompt visibility — selected brand

API: prompt_id dimension on brand report · 28d window

#	Prompt	Visibility	Mentions	Position	Sentiment	Volume	Topic

Brand × AI model heatmap — all tracked brands

API: model_channel_id dimension · 28d window · Google AI Overview: 0/21 chats for all 12 own brands (API-confirmed)

Own brand group avg visibility by AI channel · API: model_channel_id dimension

Key model findings — from API data

ChatGPT UI: SlotoCash 3.00%, Uptown Aces 2.86% lead own brands (API: 126/4200 and 120/4200). Ignition 6.45% (271/4200) and BitStarz 7.29% (306/4200) exceed all 12 own brands.

Perplexity UI: SlotoCash 2.29% (96/4201), Uptown Aces 2.24% (94/4201). Ignition 2.79% (117/4201). Own brands moderately visible.

Google AI Overview: 0/21 chats for all 12 own brands (API: visibility_count=0, visibility_total=21). Ignition: 4/21 (19.0%), Raging Bull: 2/21 (9.5%), BitStarz: 1/21 (4.8%).

Jackpot Capital 90d decline: started at ~3.3% visibility in Feb, now 0.76% (API: 64/8422 vs 422/22634 for 90d). Sustained, not a one-week anomaly.

Top citing domains — AI ecosystem (28d)

API: Peec.ai domain report · 28d · cite rate = citation_count ÷ retrieval_count per domain (v0.12.0 metric)

Domain	Type	Citations	Retrievals	Cite rate	RTG brands mentioned

Key cited URLs — own brand mentions

API: Peec.ai URL report · 28d · citation_rate metric (v0.12.0)

Page	Type	Brands	Citations	Cite rate	Authority

BFPBonus / Free Play — queries about bonuses, free chips, no-deposit offers, deposit matches. Example: “no deposit bonus casino”, “casino free chips”, “best reload bonus”

TFPTop / Featured Picks — generic “best of” ranking queries. Example: “best online casinos”, “top rated online casinos”, “most trusted online casino”

Brand (own)Query containing an own brand name. Near-100% visibility but represents existing demand, not new audience reach. Example: “slotocash casino”, “decode casino review”

Brand (competitor)A competitor’s brand name as the full query. Own brands rarely appear here — potential co-mention opportunity. Example: “springbok casino”, “thunderbolt casino” when searched by users

Full visibility (100%)

6

brand-name queries only

Partial (1–99%)

~30

some AI mentions

Not visible (0%)

~114

76% of 150 tracked prompts

High-vol gaps

32+

zero visibility across group

Top visible prompts — own brands (28d)

API: Peec.ai brand report with prompt_id dimension · 28d · sorted by visibility

#	Prompt	Best brand	Visibility	Mentions	Position	Volume	Topic

Priority gaps — high-volume, 0% visibility across all own brands

API: visibility_count = 0 for all own brand IDs on these prompt_ids · volume tiers from Peec.ai list_prompts API (volume field, v0.2.0)

Prompt	Volume	Topic	Action

High priority

5

immediate action

Medium priority

4

next 30 days

Supplementary

3

monitoring / process

Data source legend: API direct = raw Peec.ai API value API computed = calculated from API fields Editorial = interpretation / recommendation based on data

Prioritized action plan