RTG Group — AI Visibility Dashboard

All brands — visibility ranking (Apr 27 – May 24, 2026)

Visibility % = share of AI conversations mentioning this brand · click any row to open brand detail · blue = own brand · red = competitor · Δ vs prior 28d (Mar 30 – Apr 26)

#	Brand	Role	Visibility	Bar	Avg position	Sentiment	Δ 28d (API)

Weekly visibility — own brands (weeks 18–21)

Sentiment score — own brands (current 28d) · target ≥ 60

Weekly visibility — selected brand vs own-group average

RAG status — current 28d

Visibility by AI model channel

Visibility % per active channel · values calculated from raw API counts · visibility_count ÷ visibility_total

Prompt visibility — selected brand

Queries where this brand appears in AI responses

#	Prompt	Visibility	Mentions	Position	Sentiment	Volume	Topic

Brand × AI model heatmap — all tracked brands

Visibility % per channel · calculated as visibility_count ÷ visibility_total from API · Google AI Overview: 0% for all 12 own brands confirmed by API (0 of 21 chats)

Own brand group avg visibility by model channel

Key findings from API data

ChatGPT UI: Slotocash 3.00%, Uptown Aces 2.86% lead own brands. Ignition 6.45% and BitStarz 7.29% are ahead of all 12 own brands on this channel.

Perplexity UI: Decode leads own brands at 1.69%. All own brands present at 0.62–2.29%. Ignition 2.79%, Raging Bull 2.52%.

Google AI Overview: 0 of 21 chats for all 12 own brands (API: visibility_count = 0, visibility_total = 21). Ignition: 4/21 chats (19.0%). Raging Bull: 2/21 (9.5%). BitStarz: 1/21 (4.8%).

Jackpot Capital: 61.2% visibility decline confirmed by API — 64/8422 current vs 145/7409 prior. Requires immediate investigation.

Top citing domains — AI ecosystem (28d)

Domains appearing in AI conversations · cite rate = avg citations per chat when this domain is retrieved · data from Peec.ai domain report API

Domain	Type	Citations	Retrievals	Cite rate	RTG brands mentioned

Key cited URLs — own brand mentions

Pages explicitly mentioning own-group brands in AI responses · from Peec.ai URL report API

Page	Type	Brands	Citations	Cite rate	Authority

BFPBonus / Free Play — queries about bonuses, free chips, no-deposit offers, deposit matches (e.g. “no deposit bonus casino”, “casino free chips”)

TFPTop / Featured Picks — generic “best of” ranking queries (e.g. “best online casinos”, “top rated online casinos”, “most trusted online casino”)

Brand (own)Query containing an own brand name directly. Near-100% visibility but represents existing branded demand, not new audience reach.

Brand (competitor)A competitor’s brand name as the query. Own brands rarely appear — these represent co-mention opportunities.

Full visibility (100%)

6

brand-name queries only

Partial (1–99%)

~30

some AI mentions

Not visible (0%)

~114

76% of 150 tracked prompts

High-vol gaps

32+

zero visibility across group

Top visible prompts — own brands

Queries where at least one own brand appears · from Peec.ai prompt-dimension brand report

#	Prompt	Best own brand	Visibility	Mentions	Position	Volume	Topic

Priority gaps — high-volume, 0% visibility across all own brands

High & very-high volume queries where no own-group brand has any AI visibility (visibility_count = 0)

Prompt	Volume	Topic	Action

High priority

5

immediate action required

Medium priority

4

next 30 days

Supplementary

3

monitoring / process

Prioritized action plan — based on API data only